<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Republicans for Family Values &#187; Log Cabin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/category/log-cabin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 04:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>&#8216;Gay&#8217; Lobby Group Condemns McCain &#8212; as McCain Said to Be &#8216;Proud&#8217; of Past Log Cabin Endorsement</title>
		<link>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2008/06/10/gay-lobby-group-bashes-mccain-as-mccain-said-to-be-proud-of-past-log-cabin-endorsement/</link>
		<comments>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2008/06/10/gay-lobby-group-bashes-mccain-as-mccain-said-to-be-proud-of-past-log-cabin-endorsement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter LaBarbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homosexual Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Campaign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Log Cabin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2008/06/10/gay-lobby-group-bashes-mccain-as-mccain-said-to-be-proud-of-past-log-cabin-endorsement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans For Family Values is back online, just in time to highlight this report from the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade &#8212; which aptly explains both social conservatives&#8217; ambivalence toward Sen. John McCain and the reason why, when faced with a potential President Obama, most are reluctantly supporting the Arizona Republican.
McCain&#8217;s Human Rights Campaign 2006 Congressional [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/uploads/2008/06/john_mccain.jpg" title="john_mccain.jpg"><img src="http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/uploads/2008/06/john_mccain.jpg" alt="john_mccain.jpg" align="left" height="296" hspace="15" width="234" /></a><strong>Republicans For Family Values</strong> is back online, just in time to highlight this report from the homosexual newspaper <a href="http://www.washblade.com/2008/6-6/news/national/12699.cfm"><em>Washington Blade</em></a> &#8212; which aptly explains both social conservatives&#8217; ambivalence toward Sen. John McCain and the reason why, when faced with a potential President Obama, most are reluctantly supporting the Arizona Republican.</p>
<p>McCain&#8217;s <a href="http://www.hrc.org/documents/HRCscorecard2006.pdf">Human Rights Campaign 2006 Congressional Scorecard</a> rating of 33 percent, though way too high from the perspective of most conservatives, is in stark contrast to Obama&#8217;s 89 out of 100 in the same HRC Scorecard. McCain voted against HRC on all but one key vote (he opposed the <strong>Federal Marriage Amendment</strong>), while Obama voted with HRC on all but one vote (he did not support a pro-homosexual immigration bill).</p>
<p>Here is another way to compare the two senators&#8217; records: Human Rights Campaign&#8217;s analysis of <a href="http://capwiz.com/hrc/bio/sponsortrack/?id=3181">Obama&#8217;s co-sponsorship of pro-homosexual legislation</a> backed by HRC, versus the same analysis  for <a href="http://capwiz.com/hrc/bio/sponsortrack/?id=192">McCain</a>.)</p>
<p>The fact that McCain&#8217;s spokesman reports (below) that the senator was &#8220;proud&#8221; to receive the endorsement of the homosexual <a href="http://online.logcabin.org/">Log Cabin Republicans</a> &#8212; a group that crusades for homosexual &#8220;marriage&#8221; and routinely demonizes Christian conservatives just as all the other &#8220;gay&#8221; activist groups do&#8211; will stick in the craw of pro-family Republicans.</p>
<p>We eagerly wait to see if McCain smartly makes a serious play for pro-family, conservative voters in the wake of California&#8217;s homosexual &#8220;marriage&#8221; ruling, or opts instead to try to split the middle of the GOP&#8217;s &#8220;big tent&#8221; &#8212; perhaps even making bolder pro-homosexual overtures to court &#8220;moderates.&#8221; &#8212; <em>Peter LaBarbera</em></p>
<p>The following is excerpted from a <a href="http://www.washblade.com/2008/6-6/news/national/12699.cfm">Washington Blade report June 6</a> (emphasis added):</p>
<p><span id="more-47"></span><strong>HRC Blasts McCain</strong></p>
<p>HRC [Human Rights Campaign] on Tuesday released a compilation of Sen. John McCain’s statements and stances on gay issues. The five-page report called McCain an “opponent of equality” and “out of touch with the GLBT community.”</p>
<p>Lisa Schwartz, HRC’s legal director, said McCain as president would “act against the civil rights” that gay Americans seek, including “basic fairness” guarantees in the workplace.</p>
<p><strong>“John McCain opposed the Employment Non-Discrimination Act,”</strong> she said. “He opposes protections for GLBT people so that they can go to work and lead the productive lives that they can and deserve to.”</p>
<p>Schwartz said McCain also opposes hate crimes legislation that is supported by an “overwhelming bulk” of Americans, plus many chiefs of police and state attorneys general.</p>
<p><strong>“John McCain has had three opportunities to vote for hate crimes legislation that would protect people on the basis of race, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity and disability,” she said. “And all three times, he’s voted against this legislation.”</strong></p>
<p>Schwartz said McCain exhibits a “backward looking way of thinking that doesn’t reflect what most Americans believe about” these issues.</p>
<p>The report does not assign McCain a score. He received 33 of 100 on HRC’s most recent congressional scorecard. Obama scored 89 of 100.</p>
<p><strong>Brian Rogers, a McCain campaign spokesperson</strong>, said in a statement to the <em>Blade</em> that McCain would continue to seek support from all Americans.</p>
<p>“Sen. McCain is seeking support from all Americans this November, based on his vision for moving America forward and his long record of treating people with respect and dignity,” Rogers said. “<strong>He was proud to receive an endorsement from the Log Cabin Republicans in his 2004 re-election campaign</strong>, and we’re confident he’ll win strong support this fall.”</p>
<p>Log Cabin has not yet announced whether it will endorse McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2008/06/10/gay-lobby-group-bashes-mccain-as-mccain-said-to-be-proud-of-past-log-cabin-endorsement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Log Cabin Romney Ad Ignores Homosexuality and Calls Pro-Lifers &#8216;Religious Extremists&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2007/11/12/log-cabin-romney-ad/</link>
		<comments>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2007/11/12/log-cabin-romney-ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 02:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter LaBarbera</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Log Cabin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2007/11/12/log-cabin-romney-ad/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out this anti-Romney ad created by the homosexual activist Log Cabin Republicans which, strangely, does not mention Romney&#8217;s flip-flops on homosexuality. We agree with Log Cabin that Romney is a political chameleon, but it&#8217;s odd that Log Cabin chose to highlight issues other than the one that defines their organization.
Perhaps the LCR strategists understood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out this anti-Romney ad created by the homosexual activist <a href="http://www.logcabin.org">Log Cabin Republicans</a> which, strangely, does not mention Romney&#8217;s flip-flops on homosexuality. We agree with Log Cabin that Romney is a political chameleon, but it&#8217;s odd that Log Cabin chose to highlight issues other than the one that defines their organization.</p>
<p>Perhaps the LCR strategists understood that drawing attention to Romney&#8217;s support for a <strong>Federal Marriage Amendment</strong> would actually help him among Iowa voters. Regardless of the reason why, Log Cabin&#8217;s current and past support for &#8220;pro-choice&#8221; Republicans shows them to be the liberal special interest group that they are.</p>
<p><strong>So if you&#8217;re a pro-life Republican, you&#8217;re a &#8220;religious extremist&#8221;?</strong> That&#8217;s pure bigotry and the sort of demonization we&#8217;re used to from the Left, not &#8220;conservatives&#8221; (as the Log Cabinites often claim to be). Republicans would be as foolish to drop their principled pro-life platform defending the unborn as they would be to embrace pro-homosexual &#8220;civil unions&#8221; or &#8220;same-sex marriage.&#8221; &#8212; <em>Peter LaBarbera</em></p>
<p><em>P.S. After the spot plays, you can click on the various bottom images to watch coverage of the Log Cabin ad by major network news shows: </em></p>
<p><object class="embed" width="425" height="350" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Elx3UWmyAY4"><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Elx3UWmyAY4" /><em>You need to a flashplayer enabled browser to view this YouTube video</em></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://republicansforfamilyvalues.com/2007/11/12/log-cabin-romney-ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
